Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kevin Stricker's avatar

I think my main frustration the last couple of years has been that one seems to be able to get away with data manipulation murder so long as one doesn't contradict "the narrative"

As soon as one does contradict "the narrative" the information is promptly deplatformed, for reasons as spurious as "not being peer-reviewed" when anyone who actually pays attention to these things knows that things that go against the narrative are scrutinized 100x harder than the analytical pablum spewed regularly by Krugman et al.

It's damn near impossible to know what to believe without devoting a significant chunk of time to the endeavour.

Expand full comment
David Shane's avatar

Yeah, Michigan State University, right next to us... oh, what to say. When they created a vaccine mandate last August, I thought, "I'm against this, but I guess at least it's a path to ending their mask mandate". Silly me, they never ended their mask mandate. Now they have a booster mandate too. And now they've moved their January classes online. And the letter from the president announcing the change includes a vague comment about "additional information shared on the vaccine and booster requirements" in the future, which makes me wonder... what is booster #2 mandate coming? I'm not sure what additional information there is to share when you already have a booster mandate. Vaccination requirements to attend sporting events maybe? You got me.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts