Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling

Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling

Share this post

Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling
Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling
Let's Renew Shame for the Censors
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Let's Renew Shame for the Censors

The overwhelming indifference to Twitter's recent display of censorship shows that we need more social pressure to discourage government censorship

polimath's avatar
polimath
Jan 05, 2023
∙ Paid
20

Share this post

Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling
Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling
Let's Renew Shame for the Censors
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

While I was trying to take a break from the world this Christmas, David Zweig became the latest journalist to write about how Twitter manipulated its algorithms for hiding, blocking, and deplatforming information at the request of government and political actors. What made Zweig’s investigation into this particularly interesting is that it is entirely around the question of what COVID information Twitter was permitting people to see.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki arrives for the daily White House Briefing with Surgeon General Vice Admiral Vivek Murthy in the in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC on Thursday, July 15, 2021.

I’ve been following Zweig for quite some time. As the pandemic progressed, he became one of my core COVID groups, which was about 20-30 people focused on COVID data and developments. We were all doing what we would normally consider basic reporting on source information, scientific studies, what experts were saying, what the CDC was reporting, and how the core data was shaking out.

Zweig’s piece at The Free Press is a good starting point. I am not at all surprised that Twitter was manipulating the visibility of information on their platform. My own tweets were frequently caught up in these censorship dragnets. As one of his most powerful examples, Zweig points to a tweet from Kelley K (now writing at

Check Your Work
) in which she was censored for objecting to false information and linking to data directly from the CDC.

This is all so awful and frustrating and I could go on at some length about how bad it is that we’re trapped in this information ecosystem where true information is suppressed at the request of our own government. There is a time and place for that.

For now, my primary worry is that while this government manipulation of truth is exactly what we have been trained from grade school to shudder at, so many people seem entirely nonplussed over the revelations.

I thought we had a cultural agreement that this kind of active manipulation of the truth was something that would instantly and instinctively repulse us if we were to encounter it in real life. This is why we make high schoolers read 1984, this is why we have fifty movies about the evils of the Hollywood Blacklists, this is why the word “McCarthyism” is a slur about how government pressure is evil and those in government with a censorious bent are to be reviled and disdained.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Matt Shapiro's Marginally Compelling to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Matt Shapiro
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More