Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric Wormus's avatar

"We need to find some way of striking that compromise, to not insist that my preferred activities are risk-less and high value while your preferred activities are high risk and and valueless."

One of the other things I wish we could be more consistent with is identifying who it is that we are placing at risk.

Early on, whenever someone wanted to do something (playgrounds/haircuts/restaurants/visit friends), they would say they understand the risk the virus poses to them, will be careful, but ultimately believe they will be safe. This was met by a loud chorus of people who would tell them that while they may not personally be at great risk, by being around other people they could easily wind up unwittingly killing someone else's grandma. The motto was, we all have to refrain from doing our personal high value activities, and by doing so we will prevent the death of someone else's grandma.

Fast forward to the protests, and suddenly the risk/value changed from societal risk vs personal value to personal risk vs societal value. If you point out that protests are likely to increase, at some level, the spread of COVID you would hear the same people tell you that these protesters understand the risk to themselves and are willing to undertake that risk to protest a societal ill and hopefully change it for the better.

That's fine and well, but we shouldn't allow some people to make decisions based only on their personal risk while demanding others make decisions based on some larger societal risk.

Expand full comment
JS's avatar

Here's a thought about the risk vs. value tradeoff:

Yesterday you retweeted a thread from @TheAgeofShoddy about how, left and right, our response to COVID has largely been filtered through a political lens (particularly the lens of the upcoming election), and that this has significantly hampered our ability or willingness to rationally and effectively respond to the virus.

I would submit that these decisions themselves represent risk vs. value tradeoffs. Namely, that the value of getting [Trump/Biden] elected justifies the risk of pushing reductionist and likely inaccurate narratives about COVID. I don't think anyone is going to come out and say it (since that would be counterproductive to the supreme value of getting [Trump/Biden] elected), but I'm sure it's at least a subconscious factor in a lot of COVID-related commentary.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts